Skip to content

Model catalog

A panel of rivals, not a single oracle

Every claim you check is voted on by up to 4 frontier models from different providers, then an independent judge weighs their reasoning into one verdict. These are the models you can put on your panel — each adds its credit weight to the per-claim price, so the quote always reflects the panel you chose.

ModelProviderCredit weight / claim
Claude Opus 4.8Anthropic8
Claude Sonnet 4.6Anthropic5Recommended panel
GPT-5.5OpenAI10
GPT-5.4 MiniOpenAI2Recommended panel
Gemini 3.5 FlashGoogle3Recommended panel
Gemini 3.1 ProGoogle4
DeepSeek V4 FlashDeepSeek1Recommended panel
Grok 4.3xAI1
Kimi K2.6Moonshot AI2
GLM 5Z.ai1
Qwen3.7 MaxQwen2
Llama 4 MaverickMeta1
Mistral Medium 3.1Mistral1

The lineup evolves as new models ship — this page always reflects the current catalog.

How the panel works

  • Panel votes. Each model on your panel checks every claim independently — Model Fact-Check from its own knowledge, Live Research with live web search and citations.
  • An independent judge. Claude Opus 4.8 synthesizes the panel's votes, reasoning, and evidence into one consensus verdict with a calibrated confidence score. You can pick a different judge for your organization.
  • An adversarial challenger. When the panel is unanimous and confident, a cheap independent model tries to refute the verdict before it's confirmed — dissent escalates to the full judge.
  • Spell & grammar (Tier 1) runs on a fixed fast model (Gemini 3.5 Flash) and isn't part of the picker.

Read the full pipeline write-up on the methodology page, or see pricing for how credit weights turn into a quote.

Customize your panel

Signed-in organization admins choose which models vote and which judge presides on the panel settings page. New accounts start on the recommended panel above.