Skip to content

Model catalog

Which models vote on your claims

Up to 4 models from different providers vote on every claim you check. A separate judge model weighs their reasoning into one verdict. These are the models you can put on your panel. Each adds its credit weight to the per-claim price, so the quote reflects the panel you chose.

ModelProviderCredit weight / claim
Claude Opus 5Anthropic8
Claude Sonnet 5Anthropic5Recommended panel
GPT-6 AstraOpenAI17
GPT-5.6 SolOpenAI4
GPT-5.4 MiniOpenAI2Recommended panel
Gemini 3.8 FlashGoogle3Recommended panel
Gemini 3.1 ProGoogle4
DeepSeek V4.1 FlashDeepSeek1Recommended panel
Grok 4.6xAI2
Kimi K3Moonshot AI5
GLM 5.3Z.ai2
GLM 5.3 FlashZ.ai1
Qwen3.8 2.4TQwen2
Llama 4 MaverickMeta1
Mistral Medium 3.5Mistral3

We add and retire models as providers ship them. This page reads from the live catalog, so it is always current.

How the panel works

  • Panel votes. Each model on your panel checks every claim on its own. In Model Fact-Check it argues from its own knowledge. In Live Research it searches the live web and cites its sources.
  • A separate judge. Claude Opus 5 reads the panel's votes, reasoning, and evidence and writes one consensus verdict with a calibrated confidence score. Organization admins can pick a different judge.
  • An adversarial challenger. When the panel is unanimous and confident, a cheap model that is not on the panel tries to refute the verdict before we confirm it. If it finds a dissent, the claim goes to the full judge.
  • Spell & grammar (Tier 1) runs on a fixed fast model (Gemini 3.8 Flash) and isn't part of the picker.

Read the full pipeline write-up on the methodology page, or see pricing for how credit weights turn into a quote.

Customize your panel

Signed-in organization admins choose which models vote and which judge decides on the panel settings page. New accounts start on the recommended panel above.